The law has been active for almost a century. It states that “any man or woman, not being married to each other, who lewdly and lasciviously associates and cohabits together… is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine of not more than $1,000.” The amendments to the law eliminate the ban on cohabitation.
Read more at MSN.com
The First Amendment does not protect threats—that much is clear. But the Supreme Court has provided little guidance on what qualifies as a threat. That may soon change, when the Court decides Counterman v. Colorado, which will be argued next Wednesday.
Read more at The Atlantic
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered $62,412 in back wages and damages for 20 employees of a Grand Rapids restaurant. The failure to pay overtime wages is far too common in the restaurant industry.
Read more at Fox17
You've probably broken every single one of these laws...
Read more at Readers Digest
Money From Debt Elimination Services Fraud Scheme Successfully Forfeited And Returned To Victim
A “debt elimination services” scam. If it sounds too good to be true…
Read more at DOJ
Lawyers and legal academics have gravitated to the buzzy corporate psychodrama in part because it highlights corporate law issues rarely featured in television shows or movies
Read more at Reuters.com
Is my money safe? What you need to know about bank failures
Yes, if your money is in a U.S. bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and you have less than $250,000 there. If the bank fails, you’ll get your money back.
Nearly all banks are FDIC insured. You can look for the FDIC logo at bank teller windows or on the entrance to your bank branch.
Read more at Associated Press
Michigan's old reading law was "state-mandated mass flunking of third grade students based on one reading test score."
Read more at Detroit Free Press
Generative AI Captures Imagination of Lawyers, Law Students, Consumers Alike
Majority of lawyers have no immediate plans to use generative AI, LexisNexis survey finds. The survey revealed that a majority of lawyers and law students can see potential in generative AI in advancing the practice of law. However, many cite concerns about the ethical implications.
Read more at LexisNexis
Results suggest the justices are on reasonable grounds to hesitate. Contentious exchanges are those the media will cover. If the media are able to present such stories with the Zoom-like camera angle, the results for the court could be devastating.
Read more at The Wall Street Journal
